When 'go env' without an argument prints environment variables as
a script which can be executed by the shell, variables with a
list value in Plan 9 (such as GOPATH) need to be printed with each
element enclosed in single quotes in case it contains characters
significant to the Plan 9 shell (such as ' ' or '=').
For #58508
Change-Id: Ia30f51307cc6d07a7e3ada6bf9d60bf9951982ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/493535
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
1.3 expects the record version is always 1.2 (0x0303), this previously
wasn't enforced.
Change-Id: I8bc88f588e76f9b862b57601336bb5c5ff08b30e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/485876
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
It was no longer used since CL 314609
Change-Id: Id103b7490a6088a589d76442d3740f8a1453c25d
GitHub-Last-Rev: 20a7fe0778
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#56608
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/448277
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
keysForBenchmarking and valuesForBenchmarking are only used in benchmark
tests.
Change-Id: Ie4fcb81e0470cc8627b395644787429b79952538
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497380
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Add a shortlink in the doc to a guide to writing handlers, which is a work
in progress.
Change-Id: I1b01c90468382ffe53d9ad6f38253906e3f44857
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/495920
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
The indentation makes the URL be treated as a code block,
thus preventing automatic detection of this URL.
Avoid using a code block for this.
Change-Id: Ie37ae18ec0969ef2d5a6e3b92b2512dac093dbf6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/478015
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Add doc details to Transport mentioning retries only occur if a connection
has been already been used successfully.
Change-Id: I37afbad50b885248e0e6cd5e799ad848bf97c86b
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7c45c32aec
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#51273
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/386994
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
CL 497075 refactored NewFile to unconditionally dereference the file
returned by newFile. However, newFile can return nil if passed a
negative FD, which now causes a crash.
Resolve this by moving the invalid check earlier in NewFile, which also
lets us avoid a useless fcntl syscall on a negative FD.
Since we convert to int to check sign, adjust newFile to take an int
rather than uintptr, which cleans up a lot of conversions.
Fixes#60406
Change-Id: I382a74e22f1cc01f7a2dcf1ff4efca6a79c4dd57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497877
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The actual selection code already worked
(except for the x/mod parser not reading the file),
so all that is necessary is a test.
For the test, move the version check up before
the module line presence check.
For #57001.
Change-Id: Iaa4f9b92d38fcfd99dc1665ec8d3eb0e52007bb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497555
TryBot-Bypass: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Before this CL, the documentation for Formatter suggested that
implementers of Format(f State, verb rune) could use Fprint(f) or
Sprint(f) to generate output. The Sprint(f) suggestion however is
invalid.
Fix that by simply suggesting Sprint() alongside Fprint(f).
Fixes#60358
Change-Id: I024e996f6360b812968ef2cd5073cb4c223459e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497379
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Paul Jolly <paul@myitcv.org.uk>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Currently /gc/scan/total:bytes is computed as a separate sum. Compute it
using the same inputs so it's always consistent with the sum of
everything else in /gc/scan/*.
For #56857.
Change-Id: I43d9148a23b1d2eb948ae990193dca1da85df8a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497880
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Use io.Copy¹ that matches the comment more closely, avoids the
possibility of needing a bigger array, and is slightly shorter.
Its downside is that it takes two w.Write calls instead of one.
¹ Admittedly, it was temping to use io.CopyBuffer since the 'data'
byte slice becomes a viable buffer after its contents are written.
I resisted that temptation for two reasons.
One, it would need the io.Reader returned by dec.Buffered() (currently
a *bytes.Reader) to not implement the io.WriterTo interface for any
chance of making a positive difference. This seems not very likely.
Two, to avoid burdening anyone with determining that io.CopyBuffer
won't panic without 'if len(data) == 0 && data != nil { data = nil }'
because json.Marshal never returns an empty but non-nil byte slice.
Change-Id: I33c53d9d990f6ee79cd3ab90f12e3b575b9ebe72
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497736
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Bypass: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
In contrast to the HasSuffix argument, there's no need or benefit in
having a ":" before the "racebench" variant mentioned in the message.
(The variant comes after the colon separator—it doesn't include it.)
Change-Id: Ie9948104de9449422037bf39245944255b98f1b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497735
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This reverts CL 494057.
Reason for revert: test is failing on -race builders.
Fixes#60393.
Change-Id: If98238a12673aec597cf69aeead7bdf4782b4524
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497996
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
build_pgo.txt hard-coded a check for / rather than using ${/}, causing a
failure on Windows
The failure in build_pgo_auto_multi.txt is more interesting. If the
first argument to stdout starts with `-` the script engine expects it to
be a flag to grep, and thus doesn't regexp-escape `\` in the expansion
of `${/}`.
The script engine doesn't _require_ that these are flags to grep, so it
is still possible to use them for matching, but this ideally will change
in the future, so change all patterns to avoid starting with `-`.
Fixes#60408.
Change-Id: Ie4041a730d22ce40a4436abae7713f211dcb42e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497881
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts commit e7a9ca0a53.
Reason for revert: Decided to delay to Go 1.22.
Change-Id: I4635cb4c1372b54cac573041be8a43e294de5183
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497975
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
In theory by allocating new objects every time, the benchmark is
including the performance of allocating new pinner bits for a span. In
practice however, most of the time each span already does have pinner
bits allocated (it's still a rare operation).
We can get a better sense of the raw cost of pinning an object (minus
pinner bits allocation) by moving the object allocation out of the inner
loop.
Change-Id: I2869fa6c3f353b726fe8440d2e6b7f89902f9364
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497620
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Name constraints are checked during path building. When a new
certificate is considered for inclusion in a chain we check if it has
name constraints, and if it does, check that they apply to the certs
already in the chain, discarding it if the current chain violates any
of the constraints the candidate introduces.
This check was not acting as intended in two ways. The first was that
we only checked that the constraints on the candidate certificate
applied to the leaf certificate, and not the rest of the certiifcates in
the chain. This was the intended behavior pre-1.19, but in 1.19 we
intended for the constraints to be applied to the entire chain (although
obviously they were not).
The second was that we checked that the candidates constraints applied
to the candidate itself. This is not conformant with RFC 5280, which
says that during path building the constraint should only be applied to
the certificates which follow the certificate which introduces the
constraint (e.g. in the chain A -> B -> C, if certificate Bcontains a
name constraint, the constraint should only apply to certificate C).
The intended behavior introduced in 1.19 was mainly intended to reject
dubious chains which the WebPKI disallows, and are relatively rare, but
don't have significant security impact. Since the constraints were
properly applied to the leaf certificate, there should be no real impact
to the majority of users.
Fixes#59171
Change-Id: Ie6def55b8ab7f14d6ed2c09351f664e148a4160d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/478216
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Use the os.ReadFile implementation to handle
sysfs files not reporting size properly via stat.
Fixes#53761
Change-Id: I6f34515e8a211e3659f4f6c3598fae7ec0c86975
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/416775
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: hopehook <hopehook@golangcn.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
RISC-V modified the address of github and the suffix of the file.
The previous link is no longer accessible. use latest link.
Change-Id: I5e33ea8447a59b8183658248df05c79ddd380cba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497378
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
This test is fundamentally flaky because of a mismatch between how
internal idle time is calculated and how the test expects it to be
calculated. It's unclear how to resolve this mismatch, given that it's
perfectly valid for a goroutine to remain asleep while background
goroutines (e.g. the scavenger) run. In practice, we might be able to
set some generous lower-bound, but until we can confirm that on the
affected platforms, skip the test as flaky unconditionally.
For #60276.
For #60376.
Change-Id: Iffd5c4be10cf8ae8a6c285b61fcc9173235fbb2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497876
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
setPGOProfilePath sets Package.Internal.PGOProfile very late in package
loading (because it may split/copy packages). Build info was computed
long before this, causing PGO packages to miss -pgo from their build
settings.
Adjust BuildInfo to be stored as *debug.BuildInfo rather than eagerly
converting to a string. This enables setPGOProfilePath to update the
BuildInfo at the same point that it sets PGOProfile.
Change-Id: Ic12266309bfd0f8ec440b0dc94d4df813b27cb04
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496958
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
name old time/op new time/op delta
Values-10 8.67ms ± 0% 7.19ms ± 2% -17.05% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Values-10 58.2kB ± 2% 48.3kB ± 2% -17.14% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Values-10 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
Change-Id: Idd35ea37514a21d97bdd6191c8fb8a478c00e414
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/481436
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: xie cui <523516579@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Before this CL the code would record the number of race detector
errors seen before starting a test, and then report an error
if there were more race detector errors after the test completed.
That approach did not work well for subtests or parallel tests.
Race detector errors could be reported multiple times at each
level of subtest, and parallel tests could accidentally drop
race detector errors.
Instead, report each race detector error at most once, associated
with whatever test noticed the new error. This is still imperfect,
as it may report race detector errors for the wrong parallel test.
But it shouldn't drop any errors entirely, and it shouldn't report
any errors more than once.
Fixes#60083
Change-Id: Ic9afea5c692b6553896757766f631cd0e86192ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/494057
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
sql.RawBytes was added the very first Go release, Go 1. Its docs
say:
> RawBytes is a byte slice that holds a reference to memory owned by
> the database itself. After a Scan into a RawBytes, the slice is only
> valid until the next call to Next, Scan, or Close.
That "only valid until the next call" bit was true at the time,
until contexts were added to database/sql in Go 1.8.
In the past ~dozen releases it's been unsafe to use QueryContext with
a context that might become Done to get an *sql.Rows that's scanning
into a RawBytes. The Scan can succeed, but then while the caller's
reading the memory, a database/sql-managed goroutine can see the
context becoming done and call Close on the database/sql/driver and
make the caller's view of the RawBytes memory no longer valid,
introducing races, crashes, or database corruption. See #60304
and #53970 for details.
This change does the minimal surgery on database/sql to make it safe
again: Rows.Scan was already acquiring a mutex to check whether the
rows had been closed, so this change make Rows.Scan notice whether
*RawBytes was used and, if so, doesn't release the mutex on exit
before returning. That mean it's still locked while the user code
operates on the RawBytes memory and the concurrent context-watching
goroutine to close the database still runs, but if it fires, it then
gets blocked on the mutex until the next call to a Rows method (Next,
NextResultSet, Err, Close).
Updates #60304
Updates #53970 (earlier one I'd missed)
Change-Id: Ie41c0c6f32c24887b2f53ec3686c2aab73a1bfff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497675
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This change adds a generator which creates a Markdown file for each
compiler error code which includes its associated documentation. The
Markdown files will be added to the x/website repository and used
to generate short error links on the Go website.
Change-Id: Ibabc3388d6ecc7f19151f3931554f72561e30b22
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/495858
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
sparse conditional constant propagation can discover optimization opportunities that cannot be found by just combining constant folding and constant propagation and dead code elimination separately.
Updates #59399
Change-Id: Ia954e906480654a6f0cc065d75b5912f96f36b2e
GitHub-Last-Rev: 90fc02db99
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#59575
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/483875
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Before this CL, we use GetFrom3&SetFrom3 to get or set a source operand
which not fit into Prog.Reg. Those APIs operate the first element in
Prog.RestArgs without checking the type so they're fragile to break if
we have more than one different type of operands in the slice, which
will be a common case in Arm64.
This CL deprecates & renames some APIs related to Prog.RestArgs to make
those APIs more reasonable and robust than before.
Change-Id: I70d56edc1f23ccfffbcd6df34844e2cef2288432
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/493355
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Fang <eric.fang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Eric Fang <eric.fang@arm.com>
With the Garbage collector (GC), we observed a false-sharing between
work.full and work.empty. (referenced most from runtime.gcDrain and
runtime.getempty)
This false-sharing becomes worse and impact performance on multi core
system. On Intel Xeon 8480+ and default GC setting(GC=100), we can
observed top HITM>4% (by perf c2c)caused by it.
After resolveed this false-sharing issue, we can get performance 8%~9.7%
improved. Verify workloads:
DeathStarBench/hotelReservation: 9.7% of RPS improved
https://github.com/delimitrou/DeathStarBench/tree/master/hotelReservation
gRPC-go/benchmark: 8% of RPS improved
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/tree/master/benchmark
gRPC-go/benchmark 9 iterations' data with master branch:
master w/ fs opt.
208862.4 246390.9
221680.0 266019.3
223886.9 248789.7
212169.3 257837.8
219922.4 234331.8
197401.7 261627.7
214562.4 255429.7
214328.5 237087.8
229443.2 230591.3
max 229443.2 266019.3 116%
med 214562.4 248789.7 116%
avg 215806.3 248678.5 115%
Change-Id: Ib386de021cd2dbb802a107f487556d848ba9212d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496915
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We have added a new toolchain directive in go.mod and go.work.
This CL adds support in mod edit and work edit for changing the toolchain line.
For #57001.
Change-Id: I36a960796630a359b8a587877cb9548c299d5c87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497296
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
cd src/cmd
go get golang.org/x/mod@fc83a8f # CL 497400
go mod vendor
go mod tidy
For #57001.
Change-Id: I46b8584e493934883cc4148a16e287f667dcab7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497295
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This test is meant to detect the effect of Chdir not being
observed in other concurrent goroutines, possible in Plan 9
because each M runs in a separate OS process with its own
working directory. The test depends on Getwd to report the
correct working directory, but if Chdir fails then Getwd
may fail for the same reasons. We add a consistency check
that Stat(Getwd()) and Stat(".") refer to the same file.
Also change channel usage and add a sync.WaitGroup to
ensure test goroutines are not left blocked or running
when the main test function exits.
For #58802
Change-Id: I80d554fcf3617427c28bbe16e5e396367dcfe673
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/472555
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
In the type checkers, add Config.ErrorURL (or Config._ErrorURL for
go/types) to configure whether and how an error message should report
a URL for errors that have an error code.
In the compiler, configure types2 to report an error URL of the form
" [go.dev/e/XXX]", where XXX stands for the error code, with the URL
appended to the first line of an error.
Rename the compiler flag -url to -errorurl. At the moment this flag
is disabled by default.
Example for a one-line error message:
<pos>: undefined: f [go.dev/e/UndeclaredName]
Example for a multi-line error message:
<pos>: not enough arguments in call to min [go.dev/e/WrongArgCount]
have ()
want (P, P)
Change-Id: I26651ce2c92ad32fddd641f003db37fe12fdb1cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497715
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Now that the `cmp` package exists, sorting and comparison functions from
`x/exp/slices` can be ported to the standard library, using the
`cmp.Ordered` type and the `cmp.Less` and `cmp.Compare` functions.
This move also includes adjustments to the discussions in #60091 w.r.t.
NaN handling and cmp vs. less functions, and adds Min/Max functions.
The final API is taken from
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/60091#issuecomment-1553850782
Updates #60091
Change-Id: Id7e6c88035b60d4ddd0c48dd82add8e8bc4e22d3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496078
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eli Bendersky <eliben@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Eli Bendersky <eliben@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL sets enableInterfaceInference to true.
If problems arise due to this during the freeze, revert this CL.
Fixes#41176.
Fixes#57192.
Change-Id: I881ea6842e9c1101b24d9780323c6af365a40d3e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497657
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
When unifying two types A and B where one or both of them are
interfaces, consider the shared method signatures in unification.
1) If a defined interface (an interface with a type name) is unified
with another (defined) interface, currently they must originate
in the same type declaration (same origin) for unification to
succeed. This is more restrictive than necessary for assignments:
when interfaces are assigned to each other, corresponding methods
must match, but the interfaces don't have to be identical.
In unification, we don't know which direction the assignment is
happening (or if we have an assignment in the first place), but
in any case one interface must implement the other. Thus, we
check that one interface has a subset of the methods of the other
and that corresponding method signatures unify.
The assignment or instantiation may still not be possible but that
will be checked when instantiation and parameter passing is checked.
If two interfaces are compared as part of another type during
unification, the types must be equal. If they are not, unifying
a method subset may still succeed (and possibly produce more type
arguments), but that is ok: again, subsequent instantiation and
assignment will fail if the types are indeed not identical.
2) In a non-interface type is unified with an interface, currently
unification fails. If this unification is a consequence of an
assignment (parameter passing), this is again too restrictive:
the non-interface type must only implement the interface (possibly
among other type set requirements). In any case, all methods of the
interface type must be present in the non-interface type and unify
with the corresponding interface methods. If they don't, unification
will fail either way. If they do, we may infer additional type
arguments. Again, the resulting types may still not be correct but
that will be determined by the instantiation and parameter passing
or assignment checks. If the non-interface type and the interface
type appear as component of another type, unification may now
produce additional type arguments. But that is again ok because the
respective types won't pass instantiation or assignment checks since
they are different types.
This CL introduces a new unifier flag, enableInterfaceInference, to
enable this new behavior. It is currently disabled.
For #60353.
For #41176.
For #57192.
Change-Id: I983d0ad5f043c7fe9d377dbb95f6b9342f36f45f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497656
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
This relocation is not (yet?) defined in ELFv2, but has been added to
gnu gas a couple years ago. It is the same reloc as
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC, but hints power10 instructions should not be
emitted.
See binutils commit 7aba54da426b9999085d8f84e7896b8afdbb9ca6.
Fixes#60348
Change-Id: Ie953cd7bf1ffc621b498d4dbebb5de1231833c8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496918
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Currently the pinner is created outside of the benchmarking loop.
However, this means that we get to reuse the same pinner for each loop;
in general, users are expected to create a pinner for a e.g. a cgo
call and then that variable will expire with the frame it lives in. (If
they can reuse the variable, great! However, I don't expect that to be
common.)
In essence, this benchmarks a harder case. It's not more right or wrong
than the previous version, but the fact that it's a slightly harder case
(that still mostly captures what the original version was capturing) is
useful.
Change-Id: I94987127f54d7bfecd7b8e6a5e632631ea57ad24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497616
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
