5 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Rasmus Lerdorf	6f03c9e38e	This test was added to verify that bug 39322 was fixed, which the test ... does test for and this works. However, it consistently failed because it relied on a SIGHUP not terminating a sh -c /usr/bin/nohup sleep 50 process which doesn't work because the SIGHUP goes to the sh process not the nohup'ed sleep process. So, I have sped up the test and removed the nohup and instead of trying to SIGHUP I am just doing the equivalent of a kill 0 on it to verify that the resource sticks around.	2011-09-07 18:09:34 +00:00
Hannes Magnusson	ffc6da20a0	These are annoyingly slow	2011-06-23 21:27:42 +00:00
Nuno Lopes	d94e388d74	fix test on ultra-fast-machines and/or SOs with long time slices ... # Thanks Tony	2007-02-22 11:48:14 +00:00
Nuno Lopes	4f3150c350	use /usr/bin/nohup instead	2007-02-21 16:25:37 +00:00
Nuno Lopes	d446564786	Fixed bug #39322 (proc_terminate() destroys process resource)	2007-02-14 19:13:31 +00:00