Re-Fixed bug #60536 (Traits Segfault)
#Thanks to tony2001, I found the previous fix -r321089 is actually not a correct one.
#The key problem there is because the traits didn't correct set the property_info.offset
#for private properties. so here come the new fix.
# The handling of private properties in classes is now consistent with private properties in traits.
# Perviously, privates could cause strict warnings, are were not properly merged into the class when
# the parent class had a private property of the same name. Now, we introduce it without notice,
# since it is a new and independent property, just like in normal classes.
# This problem was diagnosed while working on Bug #60536.
- aliases that are not actually matching anything are treated as errors now. This
will make sure that all methods that are expected to be in a class are actually
there, or in case a trait changed for instance, that the code breaks already
on composition
- Precedence declarations are also checked to ensure that the method
which is supposed to take precedence actually exists, however,
the other traits mentioned in the declaration are not regarded.
We are more lenient here, since this avoids unnecessary fragility.
- fixed another seamingly unrelated test which broke in the progress
but wasn't clear before either.
# Moved the freeing of overriden functions to a point after the check.
# The new check comes after the normal inheritance check to give the first check
# the opportunity to abort with a more detailed error.
# Also fixed a small type in an unrelated test.
this should also exists in ext/reflection. since the new warning of "array to string convert" is introduced in zend_make_printable_zval which is used in ext/reflection too
# The handling of legacy constructors defined by traits was corrected.
# They are now properly registered and used on instantiation.
# The situation for conflicting legacy and __construct constructors is
# mostly identical. If they are defined in the class, they override conflicts
# and do not collide. However, in case different styles are mixed, between
# class and trait definition, we assume a programmer's mistake and report
# a collision.
#
# BTW: +1 for all the fixed tests! `make test` is fun again.
# The method got unconditionally deleted from the class, since it was assumed that we override it, but we did not in case of abstract methods coming from a trait. Thus, dont delete when we try to merge in an abstract method.
