* Remove unused port fields
(and set vlan to default to null)
* Update test data for deleted fields
* update vlan to null
* missed field removals
* More correct migration
* Update new data
* restore accidental deletions
* Do not include empty tables in test data
* empty data is simpler to check now
* Update test data
* revert comment options that block update all test data
* clean existing data
* fixes
* another fix
* remov extra sensors???
* why is that using that ip...
* missed an empty table
* missed one
* restore ftos
* revert another ftos
* revert ird
* restore timos
* restore timos_7705
* oops
* double oops
* timos mpls
* timos_hc
* another timos_hc fix
* Show ifSpeed on Graph
Drop ifHighSpeed, we really don't want to store that value.
* safer truth check
* Allow global setting and per-graph variable
* match surrounding case
* Style fixes
* Remove old function usage
* update schema
* remove some old usages
* cleanup more ifHighSpeed references
* update test data to remove ifHighSpeed
* fix down migration
* Add button on graph page
Change default
tweak wording
* Default to null for group yaml discovery.
* Update test data for a154bda yaml group null fix.
* Changes to guessed limit functions for sensors.
Original behaviour
===================
The file `includes/discovery/functions.inc.php` contains
`sensor_limit_low()` and `sensor_limit()` which both attempt to
guess a sane value for sensors when no explicitly defined
low_limit or high_limit can be found during discovery.
Both switch control structures used in those two functions
have empty case statements which means that if one of those matches,
it's going to fall through and run the code for each subsequent
case until a `break` is reached.
For example, when we call `function sensor_low_limit(dbm, -13.036)`
it will return the value `-12.3842` instead of `null`. That is
because there will be a match at `case 'dbm':` which falls through
all the way to `case 'cooling':`, where it performs
`$limit = -13.036 * 0.95` before hitting a `break`.
Changed behaviour
===================
Removed `power_consumed` and `count` guessed low_limit and
high_limit, I personally added those sensor classes in PR #9471
when I didn't understand that a switch control structure has
fall-through behaviour so I can guarantee that guessing limits for
those is a mistake on my behalf. It should not be there, only
power_factor can have guessed limits. Apologies for the issue,
I'm still a beginning programmer!
Furthermore, I removed guessed high_limit values for `current`
and `power` because these are supposed to draw higher values as
more devices or components are installed on for example a PDU or
a chassis.
Finally, I removed guessed low_limit and high_limit for `dbm`
sensors, there is a much too large variance in power budget on
commercially available optical transceivers for there to be a
sensible window where you can guess these values.
* Documentation on adding sensor classes.
* Update test data - sensor limit changes @ 30212d2